CIP closes Growth Markets Fund II at $3bn

About CIP

  • Founded: 2012

  • Headquarters: Copenhagen, Denmark

  • AUM: approximately €24bn as of 2024

  • Strategy: Greenfield renewable energy infrastructure globally, with sector funds targeting offshore wind, onshore wind and solar, biomass, and growth markets

  • Track record: Fund I closed at $1bn in 2021; flagship CI Fund series has raised six funds totaling over €15bn since inception

  • Leadership: Managing Partner Jakob Baruël Poulsen and founding partners led by former DONG Energy executives

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners closed Growth Markets Fund II at approximately $3bn, nearly tripling the $1bn raised for its 2021 predecessor. The fund targets greenfield renewable energy projects in Latin America, Asia, and Africa. CIP disclosed that Fund II is already more than half committed, indicating an accelerated deployment pace compared to typical multi-year investment periods for infrastructure vehicles.

The $3bn close positions CIP among the larger dedicated growth markets infrastructure fundraises in the past 18 months, a period when several peers have struggled to match prior vintages. Actis closed its fifth energy fund at $1.4bn in early 2023, down from $2.6bn for Fund IV, and Climate Fund Managers raised $1.2bn for its third vehicle in mid-2023 after closing Fund II at $900m. CIP's step-up signals continued LP appetite for renewable infrastructure in emerging markets, despite heightened currency and regulatory risks that have complicated exits for some managers.

The rapid deployment—more than half committed before final close—raises questions about pipeline depth and pricing discipline. Infrastructure funds with sub-24-month deployment windows have historically faced pressure to maintain return thresholds, particularly in competitive markets where development timelines stretch beyond initial underwriting. Whether CIP can sustain target returns while scaling commitments this quickly will depend on its ability to secure offtake agreements and navigate permitting in jurisdictions where both remain less predictable than in OECD markets.

Source: AltAssets